The Corruption Defense in Investor-State Arbitration: Why ICSID is the Wrong Forum

By Elizabeth Sheridan The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) was created in 1966 to promote international investment by providing confidence in the dispute resolution process. In many developing countries, it is essential to attract consistent foreign investment to provide necessary capital and infrastructure conducive for long-term economic and institutional development. Investor-state dispute…

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Vietnam

By Dr. Nguyet Le Background Five years after ratifying the New York Convention 1958 (the NYC), Vietnam enacted its first Commercial Arbitration Law on June 17, 2010 (Law 54). Law 54 differentiates between the annulment review of domestic arbitral awards’ proceedings and the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. It remains controversial whether this…

Arbitration Without Consent? U.S. Courts Can Force Non-Signatories to Arbitrate, Leaving Arbitrators to Decide Which Claims Will Proceed to Arbitration

By Deborah Slattery-Pereira How U.S. Courts Treat Non-Signatories Parties will subject their disputes “to arbitration if, and only if, [they] actually agree to arbitrate those disputes.” Complex commercial disputes often involve multiple international contracts with different parties, but usually, only two parties sign the arbitration agreement. Because arbitral proceedings depend on a consensual agreement, generally,…

Should Naming the Arbitral Seat not be Enough?

By Jeremy Hernandez-Lum Tong In 2020 and 2021, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (“UKSC”) made two seminal decisions on the law governing arbitration agreements, namely Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb and Kabab-Ji SAL v Kout Food Group. The latter, Kabab-Ji UKSC, recapitulated the reasoning in Enka, but differed…

Balancing Acts: The Profit Potential and Pitfalls of Investor-State Dispute Settlement

by: Shannon Moloney, Articles Editor Investor-state dispute settlement (“ISDS”) provisions provide investors and nations with a framework to arbitrate issues that arise under both bilateral investment treaties (“BIT”) and free trade agreements (“FTA”). Investors often pursue damages against host countries that are parties to international treaties with ISDS provisions if host nations do not abide…