Skip to content
The Arbitration Brief

The Arbitration Brief

  • Executive Board 2026–2027
  • About The Arbitration Brief
  • Staff 2026–2027
  • Arbitration Brief Staff Blogs
  • Publications
  • Home
  • Contact

Staff 2026–2027

Editor-in-Chief
Taraji Sheikh

Managing Articles Editor
Joey Meirson

Managing Digital Editor
Elizabeth Sheridan

Senior Articles Editors
Jonathan “Yoni” Alberts

Articles Editors

Genevieve Francois

Rebecca Liang

Kaitlyn Welsh

 

Staffer Applications for 2026–2027 Opening Soon!

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Like Loading...

@arbitrationbrief

@arbitrationbrief

Most Read

  • What We Can Learn from the Notorious P&ID v. Nigeria
    What We Can Learn from the Notorious P&ID v. Nigeria
  • The Hong Kong Exodus: How Corporate Relocation Shapes the Landscape of International Commercial Arbitration
    The Hong Kong Exodus: How Corporate Relocation Shapes the Landscape of International Commercial Arbitration
  • Reforms to OHADA Arbitration Law
    Reforms to OHADA Arbitration Law
  • Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Vietnam
    Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Vietnam
  • About The Arbitration Brief
    About The Arbitration Brief

Popular Categories

AAA Africa American Arbitration Association Arbitration Bilateral Investment Treaty BIT business China dispute-resolution Employee Employer European Union India Investment Arbitration law Mexico news SCOTUS Trade USMCA

The Dynamic Role of Compound Interest in Investment Arbitration: Substance, Procedure, and Proceduralization

By Naimeh Masumy Abstract This article critically examines the multifaceted role of compound interest in investment arbitration, challenging its traditional categorization within the substantive-procedural divide. It explores the practical challenges tribunals face when dealing with legal mechanisms like compound interest, which inherently span both procedural and substantive dimensions. To clarify this complexity, the article introduces…

thearbitrationbrief's avatar by thearbitrationbrief May 28, 2026May 28, 2026

NAFTA’s Ghost and USMCA’s Gamble: What the 2026 Review Means for Investors in Mexico

By Caroline Ennis I.              NAFTA’s Chapter 11 in Context When the U.S. and Canada entered a free trade agreement (“FTA”) in 1989, concerns emerged over the U.S. solidifying power over Canada. The primary concern was that a “hub and spoke” model, featuring the U.S. as the hub under separate bilateral agreements with Canada and Mexico,…

thearbitrationbrief's avatar by thearbitrationbrief May 12, 2026

ISDS at a Crossroads: Diverging Paths in the U.S. and U.K.

By Kaitlyn Welsh Introduction  The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) is the leading institution administering Investor-State Dispute Settlement (“ISDS”) cases, handling about 70% of all international investment disputes. The objective of ISDS is to provide foreign investors of host states with a neutral forum to resolve such disputes as opposed to reliance…

thearbitrationbrief's avatar by thearbitrationbrief April 26, 2026
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Arbitration Brief
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Arbitration Brief
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d