Brazilian Congress and Supreme Court will analyze the Arbitrators’ Duty to Disclose in the Brazilian Arbitration Act

By: Deborah Slattery-Pereira, Senior Staffer Brazil enacted the Brazilian Arbitration Act (“BAA”) in 1996, adopting the United Nations Commission on Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”) Model Law. Brazilian courts played an active role in supporting arbitration proceedings and recognizing arbitration as a constitutional alternative dispute resolution mechanism. Now, the issues of arbitrators’ duty to disclose and increased…

Goldman Sachs and 1MDB Arbitration

By: Benin Lee, Articles Editor In early October 2023, Goldman Sachs filed a suit against the government of Malaysia in the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). This developing case serves as an informative resource on contemporary arbitration developments while stimulating discourse on the advantages of LCIA arbitration and the strategic decisions made in international…

Navigating Policy Shifts in Investor-State Dispute Settlement in Latin America: A Case Study of Colombia

By: Jake Helfant States have historically utilized provisions for Investor-State Dispute Settlement (“ISDS”) to secure foreign investment, ensuring that disputes with foreign enterprises are governed and processed outside of the jurisdiction of sovereign states. Bilateral Investment Treaties (“BITs”) and Free Trade Agreements (“FTAs”) typically include ISDS provisions, mandating arbitration through the International Center for Settlement…

The New Trend of Waiving Confidentiality in Arbitration Proceedings

By: Adaeze Mgbeahuru; Junior Staffer Confidentiality is an essential part of arbitration and dispute resolution. Parties engage in arbitration and dispute resolution because of the core element of confidentiality. However, in recent times, parties in international commercial and investor-state arbitration proceedings are increasingly waiving confidentiality during and after arbitration. Recently, most institutional arbitration proceedings are…